Upper Ground Production
  • Home
  • About
  • Links
    • Film East
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LetterBoxd
  • Home
  • About
  • Links
    • Film East
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LetterBoxd
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

22/5/2018 2 Comments

Understanding Cinema | Semiotics vs. Narrative

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Film philosophers have long debated the importance of narrative and semiotics in film, exploring whether signs and symbols are more important to understanding the meaning of films than the narrative. In modern film studies, it seems that semiotics has taken a more dominant position, with the narrative of the film present only to help develop the world of the signs and symbols. Films are reliant on signs and symbols to create an unconscious reconfiguration of background knowledge and cultural understandings in the viewer. The narrative of a film remains only on the consciousness of the viewer, which can only change a person's perspective so much. Yet, signs and symbols seep into the subconscious of a viewer, which works to decode the symbolic images presented in the language of the film, reshaping a person's cultural understanding and perception of the world entirely.

​The formal style of the film produces emotion in the viewer that continues on with them even after the film has finished. The viewer doesn’t have to be consciously aware of why or how the film has produced these emotions, but the sheer exposure to these formal qualities is enough to produce a reaction from the viewer and reconfigure their understanding of the world. In Andrei Tarkovsky’s work, for example, the meanings and themes of his films are not explicitly stated in the narrative. Rather, his extensive use of formal elements and symbolic imagery to create coded meanings about the world and humanity’s relationship with it. In his film Solaris, Tarkovsky never explicitly explores the relationship between humanity and nature in the macro-narrative, yet he creates this relationship with codes, most notably having characters interact with nature (or lack of nature while in space) and overlays many of the philosophical dialogue in his film with images of nature (the ocean, clouds, landscapes). The viewer isn’t conscious of the codes Tarkovsky creates, but they are nonetheless unconsciously affected by the symbols and formal qualities of the film. Similarly, in Jordan Peele’s Get Out, formal qualities and symbolic imagery allows Peele to counteract the stereotypes associated with races in film, challenging the traditional representation of Black people on screen. Without making the macro-narrative about African-American history and the black experience in the United States, Peele is able to convey an array of ideas and themes just through the imagery and codes he puts throughout this film. Although narrative plays an important role in the conscious storytelling of a film, the codes and signs crafted by the filmmaker through symbolic imagery and formal qualities transcend beyond the film itself, leaving the viewer with an emotional and unconscious relationship with the underlying themes long after the film has ended.

Some philosophers have poses arguments against the use of semiotics and instead have argued that the macro-narrative is more important in film. An argument against semiotics in a film is the misreading of the codes and symbols by an uninformed audience. Unlike a narrative, which is much more objective, symbols can be misinterpreted and misunderstood by viewers, creating a reading of the film that is separate from its philosophical intentions. A narrative is less ambiguous and more clear when conveying the film’s message to an audience. In Get Out, the themes of race and racism are explored, not explicitly in the macro-narrative of the film, but through signs and symbols. Peele includes a number of references to African heritage (the Swahili lyrics to the score’s main theme, Chris’s use of cotton to save him for losing his brain, and the buck used both as a reference to the derogatory term for black people and the black person becoming the hunted) juxtaposed with references to White colonization and slavery (the Armitage’s plantation-like home, Missy’s teacup, and the “whitening” of Andre, Georgina, and Walter’s person and clothing). A viewer who is misinformed or insensitive to race and racism in America may misinterpret these signs and miss the true meaning behind Peele’s film.

Similarly, some philosophers would say that the macro-narrative is essential for the viewer to “understand” a film. Following the same example of racism in Get Out, if the macro-narrative had explicitly stated that the film was about the black experience and the impact of modern-day racism than the message of the film would have been more clear to the average viewer. The macro-narrative allows the viewer to “figure out” the themes and meaning for themselves, rather than having the viewer become frustrated because they don’t understand what the symbols represent. An understanding of the macro-narrative could be more beneficial for the viewer to consciously “understand” a film, but the unconscious emotions and full-bodied experience created by the style of the film can have a longer lasting effect on the reconfiguration of the subconscious of the viewer.

Signs and symbols also propagate a passive viewer because it is so reliant on the unconscious experience. A passive viewer is not aware of how the film is restructuring their background knowledge and cultural understanding; they are just aware that the film has had some profound impact on them. In Solaris, Tarkovsky’s style and use of coded language are not entirely processed by a passive viewer. Yet, after the film is over, the viewer, who had been completely submerged in the world created by Tarkovsky, has a visceral reaction to the film. The viewer can feel that film has changed something within them, but they cannot consciously articulate that change. On the other hand, the macro-narrative creates an active viewer. The narrative encourages a viewer to actively and rationally think about the film and its meanings. Again, this cognitive approach to film philosophy relies on a conscious understanding of the film, whereas the codes of film trigger unconscious emotions in the viewer.

Related Articles 

Picture

Understanding Cinema | The Importance of Cinematic Art

Read More
Picture

Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri | Review 

Read More
Picture

Politics, Class, and British Cinema | High-Rise and Brazil

Read More
2 Comments
resume writing services link
29/10/2018 18:12:03

Movie industry in the past is way more easier than what we have right now. Today, everything seems complicated. Since there are thousands of celebrities around the globe, everyone had been fighting for a single role. They want to be on top and get that spotlight that they think they deserve. Golden era of movies and televisions happened a lot of years ago, and there is nothing we could do about that anymore. I just love watching classic movies too.

Reply
STEVEN WESTON
25/9/2022 21:25:24

I would like to share my discovery of hundreds of examples of secret symbols hidden in American movies. I created a video which shows over 350 examples of this beginning in 1930, and continuing through 2022. I began cataloging my discoveries in 2016, working with professors from USC, UCLA, Yale, and Chapman University. I believe you will be amazed after viewing just the first 5 minutes of my video.

Use the PASSWORD: UCSB1971

Click this link or cut and paste link:

https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/733092911

And use the PASSWORD: UCSB1971

Respectfully yours,

Steve Weston

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Click the images below to read each article

    Features

    Feasting on Females: Consuming the Female Body in Mimi Cave’s Fresh
    Marmalade and Masculinity: Combating Toxic Masculinity with Paddington Bear
    The Delicious World of Miyazaki: Subverting Western Food Standards in Studio Ghibli
    Ugly, Delicious and Political: Politicising Cultural Dishes
    Representing Oslovian Women, starring ‘The Worst Person in the World’
    Culinary Temptations: Italian Cuisine in Luca Guadagnino’s ‘Desire Trilogy’
    David Bowie is... The Englishman Who Fell to Earth
    Kris Marshall | Love, Actually
    ‘Choose a name; something simple’: Names and Identities in ‘Money Heist’
    The Sad Eyes of Punk: Subverting the Rock Star in Anton Corbijn's Control
    The Ghost of David Bowie: Capturing Bowie's Cultural Legacy in Todd Haynes' Velvet Goldmine
    Re-assimilating the Other: Zombies, Mental Illness and Homosexuality in BBC Three’s In the Flesh
    Global Strangers: Existing Between Borders Film Collection
    Animation Artistry in Cartoon Saloon’s Wolfwalkers
    Riz Ahmed’s Goodbye to Britain: Confronting Identity and Self in ‘The Long Goodbye’
    Young Film Programmers and the Pandemic
    The Hugh Grant Archetype: Stereotyping British Identity
    “America’s Sweetheart”: White Female Privilege In ‘Gone Girl’
    Why a David Bowie biopic will always be doomed to fail
    Film Oddity: David Bowie and the Screen
    "Did you feel emotional the first time you drove in Sacramento?" Driving with Emotion in Greta Gerwig's Lady Bird
    A [Not-so-Distant] Dystopian Future... The Dystopian Landscape of Ridley Scott's Blade Runner
    Politics, Class and the British Home: British Class Represented in High-Rise and Brazil
    The New New Wave of British Cinema: Joanna Hogg and the Middle-Class Social Realist Film
    “I’m Irish.” – Paul Mescal Vs The British Empire
    "Karen, are you crazy?" The Women of Martin Scorsese's Goodfellas
    Crafting Insanity: Experiencing madness in Sherlock: The Lying Detective
    The Modern Greek Tragedy: Examining Yorgos Lanthimos's The Killing of a Sacred Deer through Aristotle's Poetics
    "But Wales is Britain. And Britain is Wales." Exploring British national identity in Netflix's The Crown
    David Bowie is the Englishman from Mars: An Examination of Englishness through Stardom
    Supporting the Black Lives Matters movement through cinematic education
    “Maybe That’s Normal”: The Normality of Mental Illness in Normal People
    Dance, Woman, Dance: Revisiting Jim Henson's Labyrinth
    How Social Realism Contributes to the Fetishisation of Britain’s Working Class
    Slut! The Sexual Liberation of Phoebe Waller-Bridge’s Women
    Time, Illness And Melancholia
    Patrick Melrose And The Trauma Of The Aristocracy
    Is A Most Popular Film Category Good For The Oscars?

    Reviews

    Toronto International Film Festival '22 | Reviews
    BFI London Film Festival 2021 | Reviews
    BFI Flare Festival 2021 | Reviews
    Norwich Film Festival 2020 | Reviews
    Raindance Film Festival 2020 | Reviews
    London Film Festival 2020 | Reviews
    Lie Low | Review
    Review: Macbeth At The Norwich Theatre Royal
    Review: La Traviata At The Norwich Theatre Royal
    A Feminist Day Out At The BFI | Woman With A Movie Camera Summit 2018

    Interviews

    Red Carpet Interviews 
    Toronto International Film Festival 2022
    Interview with Bassam Tarqi
    ​London Film Festival 2020
    Picture
    Interview with Jonathan Blagrove
    Norwich Film Festival 2020
    Interview with Jamie Weston
    Norwich Film Festival 2020
    Picture
    Interview with Stuart Laws
    Grave New World Premiere 2021

    Film East Chats Podcast on BBC Radio Norfolk

    This is a small section of episodes from the Film East podcast. Click here to listen to all episodes. 

      Contact Me! 

    Submit
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.